From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weston v. Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Jun 1, 1883
62 N.H. 574 (N.H. 1883)

Opinion

Decided June, 1883.

While the amount of money on which a debtor pays interest is deducted by tax assessors from the amount of his money on hand and at interest, their refusal to treat his national bank stock as money at interest is a discrimination prohibited by federal law.

APPEAL, from the refusal of tax assessors to abate a tax assessed on the plaintiffs' shares of the Merchant's National Bank of Manchester. Facts agreed. The amount of the plaintiffs' money on hand, money at interest, and national bank stock was less than the amount on which he paid interest.

N. P. Hunt, for the plaintiff.

W. R. Patten, for the defendants.


The plaintiff is entitled to an abatement. G. L., c. 53, s. 6; People v. Weaver, 100 U.S. 539; Supervisors v. Stanley, 105 U.S. 305; Hills v. Exchange Bank, 105 U.S. 319; Evansville Bank v. Britton, 105 U.S. 322; Cool. Tax. 389.

Case discharged.

STANLEY, SMITH and CLARK JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Weston v. Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Jun 1, 1883
62 N.H. 574 (N.H. 1883)
Case details for

Weston v. Manchester

Case Details

Full title:WESTON v. MANCHESTER

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Jun 1, 1883

Citations

62 N.H. 574 (N.H. 1883)

Citing Cases

Farmington v. Downing

Decided June, 1893.The doctrine of Weston v. Manchester, 62 N.H. 574, and Peavey v. Greenfield, 64 N.H. 284,…

Peavey v. Greenfield

"Money on hand or at interest more than the owner pays interest for" being a statutory limit of the taxation…