From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weston v. Hasty

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1963
133 S.E.2d 66 (N.C. 1963)

Opinion

Filed 6 November 1963.

Appeal and Error 3; Judgments 2 — Where, after agreement that the court might enter judgment out of term and out of the district, plaintiff's counsel, who was to prepare the judgment, becomes ill and no judgment is tendered until some year and four months after the term, the judge may properly refuse to sign the judgment and properly directs that the action be heard de novo, and an appeal from his refusal to sign the judgment will be dismissed, there being no judgment from which an appeal might be taken. Further, the Supreme Court, in the exercise of its general supervisors jurisdiction, will order that the cause be heard de novo in the county in which it was instituted.

PURPORTED appeal by plaintiffs in an action pending in UNION Superior Court.

Carswell Justice and Kermit Caldwell for plaintiff appellants.

Richardson Dawkins and Coble Funderburk for defendant appellees.


In this action, which was instituted October 22, 1957, plaintiffs and defendants, in their respective pleadings, assert ownership of certain lands in Goose Creek Township, Union County.

A stipulation dated November 9, 1961, sets forth that "upon the hearing of the above controversy without action before the Honorable Allen H. Gwyn, Judge Presiding at the October 1961 Criminal and Civil Term of the Superior Court of Union County," plaintiffs and defendants, through their attorneys of record, "in open court hereby stipulate and agree that the Judgment in the above controversy without action may be signed by the presiding judge out of term and out of district."

The attorney for plaintiffs who was to prepare and submit a proposed judgment to Judge Gwyn became sick. No judgment was prepared and presented during the period (Fall Term 1961) Judge Gwyn was the superior court judge holding in regular rotation the courts of the Twentieth Judicial District. On February 23, 1963, plaintiffs' attorneys tendered to Judge Gwyn at Chambers in Reidsville, North Carolina, a proposed judgment which contains what purports to be an "agreed statement of facts" and an adjudication of the respective rights of the parties. Judge Gwyn, being uncertain as to precisely what had been said and done at said October Term 1961 of Union Superior Court and being of opinion he had no jurisdiction after December 31, 1961, to conduct a hearing or enter judgment, declined to sign the proposed judgment tendered February 23, 1963, and refused to hear and pass upon the matter de novo.

No judgment has been entered. Plaintiffs attempted to appeal from Judge Gwyn's refusal of act further in the matter. Under the circumstances, without reference to whether he had jurisdiction, Judge Gwyn's refusal to act further was permissible and proper.

The purported appeal is dismissed; and, in the exercise of its power "to issue any remedial writs necessary to give it a general supervision and control over the proceedings of the other courts" (North Carolina Constitution, Article IV, Section 10 (1)), this Court orders that the cause be heard de novo in regular course in the Superior Court of Union County. It is noted that Judge Gwyn suggested that plaintiffs should proceed as this Court now directs.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Weston v. Hasty

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1963
133 S.E.2d 66 (N.C. 1963)
Case details for

Weston v. Hasty

Case Details

Full title:SARAH FURR WESTON, F.L. FURR, F.S. FURR, L.W. FURR, JESSIE F. HARTSELL…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1963

Citations

133 S.E.2d 66 (N.C. 1963)
133 S.E.2d 66