From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 435 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided February 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, whose opinion is reported in 97 N.J. Eq. 140.

Mr. Mark Townsend, Jr., for the appellants.

Messrs. Pitney, Hardin Skinner, for the respondent.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 435 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman

Case Details

Full title:WESTFIELD TRUST COMPANY et al., appellants, v. CHARLES K. BEEKMAN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 435 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Skovborg v. Smith

True, the rule was enunciated in Passman v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co., 57 N.J. Eq. 273 ( Ch.…

Rowe v. Rowe

The bequest of the income on the trust funds created by these two paragraphs of the will is not a bequest of…