From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westchester Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Llevon P.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 18, 2020
188 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2019–03084, 2020–01879, 2020–01881 Docket Nos. F–914–17, P–914–17

11-18-2020

In the Matter of WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, etc., respondent, v. LLEVON A.P. (Anonymous), appellant.

Scott Stone, White Plains, NY, for appellant. John M. Nonna, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (David H. Chen of counsel), for respondent. Donna M. Genovese, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.


Scott Stone, White Plains, NY, for appellant.

John M. Nonna, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (David H. Chen of counsel), for respondent.

Donna M. Genovese, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, ROBERT J. MILLER, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, Llevon A.P. appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Rachel Hahn, J.), dated September 12, 2018, (2) an order of filiation of the same court also dated September 12, 2018, and (3) an order of the same court dated March 12, 2019. The order dated September 12, 2018, after a hearing, inter alia, found that the doctrine of equitable estoppel applied to estop Llevon A.P. from denying paternity of the subject child. The order of filiation adjudicated Llevon A.P. to be the father of the subject child. The order dated March 12, 2019, denied the objections of Llevon A.P. to the finding that equitable estoppel applied to his denial of paternity and an order of the same court (Michele Reed Bowman, S.M.) dated December 5, 2018, which, upon the order dated September 12, 2018, and the order of filiation, granted that branch of the petition which was for an award of child support.

ORDERED that the appeals from the order dated September 12, 2018, and the order of filiation are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the orders are not appealable as of right and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Family Ct Act § 1112 ); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated March 12, 2019, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from the order dated September 12, 2018, and the order of filiation should be dismissed as nondispositional. The issues raised on the appeals from those orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order dated March 12, 2019.

In January 2017, the petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, inter alia, to adjudicate Llevon A.P. (hereinafter the appellant) to be the father of the subject child, who was born in 2010. The appellant denied paternity and requested DNA genetic marker testing.

The Family Court conducted a hearing to determine if equitable estoppel should preclude the DNA genetic marker testing. In an order dated September 12, 2018, the court found that the doctrine of equitable estoppel applied to estop the appellant from denying paternity of the child. The court issued an order of filiation also dated September 12, 2018, adjudicating the appellant to be the father of the child. Thereafter, in an order dated March 12, 2019, the court denied the appellant's objections to the finding that equitable estoppel applied to his denial of paternity and an order of the Support Magistrate dated December 5, 2018, which, upon the order dated September 12, 2018, and the order of filiation, granted that branch of the petition which was for an award of child support.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the best interests of the child support the Family Court's application, after the hearing, of the doctrine of equitable estoppel in determining that the appellant was the father of the child. Issues of credibility were for the court to resolve, and there is no basis to disturb its determination to credit the testimony of the child's mother and reject the appellant's testimony (see Matter of Department of Social Servs. v. Donald A.C. , 179 A.D.3d 603, 603–604, 117 N.Y.S.3d 229 ; Matter of Shaundell M. v. Trevor C., 167 A.D.3d 615, 616, 89 N.Y.S.3d 330 ).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Westchester Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Llevon P.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Nov 18, 2020
188 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Westchester Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Llevon P.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Westchester County Department of Social Services, etc.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2020

Citations

188 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
188 A.D.3d 1080
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 6800