From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. West

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 18, 1972
260 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. P-238.

April 18, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Flagler County, Horace D. Riegle, J.

J. David McFadden, of Wagner Bertone, Holly Hill, for appellant.

Nicolas A. Caputo, Holly Hill, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a final judgment of divorce in which the appellant was ordered to pay appellee the sum of $8,500.00 in installments of $40.00 per week, said payments not to be considered as alimony payments.

In divorce matters, the chancellor has broad discretion and his judgment comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Such a judgment will be affirmed unless there is a showing of an abuse of discretion. White v. White, 249 So.2d 729 (Fla.App.2d 1971).

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and have considered the briefs and oral arguments submitted by the parties, and our conclusion is that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed herein is the result of an abuse of discretion on the part of the court below. The appellee's motion for attorney's fees is granted in the amount of $500.00.

Affirmed.

SPECTOR, C.J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

West v. West

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 18, 1972
260 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

West v. West

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE E. WEST, APPELLANT, v. LOIS H. WEST, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 18, 1972

Citations

260 So. 2d 541 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Green v. Green

We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part. In dissolution of marriage actions, the trial court has…

Young, Stern Tannenbaum v. Ernst

All the proceedings under the three file numbers above referred to were consolidated. As the trial court had…