From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-3147 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-3147 KJM AC P

02-01-2013

MACK A. WEST, JR., Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

On January 4, 2013, the court ordered respondent to respond to petitioner's request for discovery, in which petitioner alleged that he did not have access to his legal files and would need discovery in order to prepare his traverse. ECF No. 98. The court held in abeyance petitioner's deadline to file his traverse pending disposition of the order to show cause.

Respondent has now responded to the order to show cause, and advises the court that petitioner has access to his legal files and that respondent has provided petitioner with the requested discovery. ECF No. 99. Accordingly, the court will discharge the order to show cause, and direct that the petitioner filed his traverse within 60 days of the filing date of this order.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court's January 4, 2013 order to show cause (ECF No. 98) is discharged; and

2. Petitioner shall file and serve a traverse within 60 days of the filing date of this order.

_______________________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

West v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-3147 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)
Case details for

West v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:MACK A. WEST, JR., Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 1, 2013

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-3147 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013)