From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wessler v. Wessler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 6, 1993
195 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 6, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.).


The complaint is sufficient to plead a cause of action for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The allegations must be deemed to be true on a CPLR 3211 (a) (7) motion, and are legally sufficient in that they would, if established, constitute serious misconduct, not mere incompatibility, even taking into account the long duration of the parties' marriage (see, Melnick v. Melnick, 115 A.D.2d 416, 417; Grubman v Grubman, 156 A.D.2d 200). The complaint is also sufficient to plead a cause of action for divorce on the ground of constructive abandonment, as to which issues of fact exist.

Defendant's request for clarification of the trial court's discretion to maintain the family corporation's "status quo", is denied in view of the permission this Court has previously given the trial court to entertain a motion on this matter and defendant's claim that she stands ready to submit such a motion.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions including that there should be a bifurcation of the legal and financial issues, and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Wessler v. Wessler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 6, 1993
195 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Wessler v. Wessler

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY M. WESSLER, Respondent, v. CORINNE B. WESSLER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 633