From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wessel v. Schwarzler. No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 1911
144 App. Div. 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

May 19, 1911.

Theodore B. Richter of counsel [ Cohen, Creevey Richter, attorneys], for the appellant.

Max D. Steuer of counsel [ Edward J. Krug, Jr.], for the respondent.


This is an action for $100,000 damages for breach of promise of marriage, and plaintiff is the daughter of Mary Wessel. For the reasons stated in Wessel v. Schwarzler, No. 1 ( 144 App. Div. 587), the order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent.

INGRAHAM, P.J., SCOTT, MILLER and DOWLING, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Wessel v. Schwarzler. No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 1911
144 App. Div. 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

Wessel v. Schwarzler. No. 2

Case Details

Full title:MAY WESSEL, Appellant, v . ALBERT J. SCHWARZLER, Respondent. (No. 2.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 19, 1911

Citations

144 App. Div. 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
129 N.Y.S. 522