Opinion
May 19, 1911.
Theodore B. Richter of counsel [ Cohen, Creevey Richter, attorneys], for the appellant.
Max D. Steuer of counsel [ Edward J. Krug, Jr.], for the respondent.
This is an action for $100,000 damages for breach of promise of marriage, and plaintiff is the daughter of Mary Wessel. For the reasons stated in Wessel v. Schwarzler, No. 1 ( 144 App. Div. 587), the order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent.
INGRAHAM, P.J., SCOTT, MILLER and DOWLING, JJ., concurred.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.