From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wesbert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 18, 2001
782 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 3D00-912.

Opinion filed April 18, 2001.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Stanford Blake, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 3d99-5251.

Affirmed and Remanded with directions.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before Goderich and Shevin, JJ., and Nesbitt, Senior Judge.


We affirm the trial court's decision revoking defendant's probation. However, as the State acknowledges, the trial court's written Order of Probation Violation does not conform to the oral pronouncements made by the trial judge at the time that the probation was revoked. Accordingly, while we affirm the revocation of probation, we remand the cause to the trial court with directions to enter an Order of Revocation that conforms to the trial judge's oral pronouncements. See Suarez v. State, 761 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)


Summaries of

Wesbert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 18, 2001
782 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Wesbert v. State

Case Details

Full title:HONORE WESBERT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 18, 2001

Citations

782 So. 2d 545 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Benitez v. State

This analysis makes it unnecessary to address the defendant's second claim of error, a point which the State…