From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wereski v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 22, 2009
Case No. 3:08cv213/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2009)

Summary

finding that counsel's failure to send records on appeal did not entitle Petitioner to equitable tolling when there was no evidence of egregious attorney misconduct

Summary of this case from Ramirez v. Sec'y

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv213/LAC/EMT.

April 22, 2009


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 24, 2009 (Doc. 32). The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 19) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wereski v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 22, 2009
Case No. 3:08cv213/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2009)

finding that counsel's failure to send records on appeal did not entitle Petitioner to equitable tolling when there was no evidence of egregious attorney misconduct

Summary of this case from Ramirez v. Sec'y
Case details for

Wereski v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:JACK DAVID WERESKI, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Apr 22, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv213/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Sec'y

In Petitioner's case, there has been no proof of "bad faith, dishonesty, or the like on counsel's part" in…

Gosha v. United States

Because Petitioner has failed to supplement his constitutional double jeopardy claim with a claim that he is…