From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wenzel v. National Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Sep 28, 1953
114 N.E.2d 562 (Ind. Ct. App. 1953)

Opinion

No. 18,450.

Filed September 28, 1953.

APPEAL — Filing of Assignment of Errors and Transcript of Record — Required to File Within 90 Days After Final Judgment or Overruling of Motion For New Trial — Rule 2-2 — Failure to File Assignment of Errors and Transcript of Record Will Result In Dismissal of Appeal Upon Petition of Appellee For Same. — Where appellee filed motion to dismiss an appeal for the reason that the assignment of errors and transcript of the record were not filed in Appellate Court within ninety days after judgment was rendered or lower court's overruling of appellant's motion for new trial and appellant did not file a motion or petition for extension of time, the Appellate Court is without jurisdiction and must accordingly dismiss the appeal.

From the Vermillion Circuit Court, Frank Fisher, Judge.

Appellant, Arthur Wenzel, failed to file his assignment of errors and transcript of record with Appellate Court within 90 days. Appellee petitioned for dismissal which was granted.

Dismissed. By the court in banc.

Donald Baker, of Terre Haute, for appellant.

Charles A. Melton, Bert F. Wood and Buena Chaney, all of Terre Haute, for appellee.


Appellee filed motion to dismiss or affirm this appeal for the reason that the assignment of errors and transcript of the record were not filed in this court within ninety (90) days after judgment was rendered or the court's overruling appellant's motion for new trial. The appellant has not filed any brief with the court or answer in opposition to the motion.

The record discloses that judgment was rendered in this case by the lower court on December 3, 1952; that appellant's motion for new trial was overruled on February 19, 1953; that the transcript and assignment of errors were not filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme and Appellate Court until June 2, 1953, which was more than ninety (90) days after the ruling on the motion for new trial and the date on which judgment was rendered. The appellant did not file a motion or petition for extension of time within which to file the transcript.

Rule 2-2 of the Supreme Court of Indiana provides in part as follows:

"In all appeals and reviews the assignment of errors and transcript of the record must be filed in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court within 90 days from the date of the judgment or the ruling on the motion for a new trial, unless the statute under which the appeal or review is taken fixes a shorter time, in which latter event the statute shall control."

In view of the fact that this court is without jurisdiction on account of appellant's failure to comply with the rules of this court in the filing of the Bill of Exceptions and transcript within ninety (90) days from date of judgment and the ruling upon motion for new trial, it is, therefore, needless for the court to consider other questions presented in appellee's motion to dismiss or affirm. Keller v. Hatfield (1945), 116 Ind. App. 105, 62 N.E.2d 400; Flanagan, Wiltrout and Hamilton, Indiana Trial and Appellate Practice, § 2524, and cases cited therein.

Accordingly, therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

NOTE. — Reported in 114 N.E.2d 562.


Summaries of

Wenzel v. National Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Sep 28, 1953
114 N.E.2d 562 (Ind. Ct. App. 1953)
Case details for

Wenzel v. National Refining Co.

Case Details

Full title:WENZEL v. THE NATIONAL REFINING COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana

Date published: Sep 28, 1953

Citations

114 N.E.2d 562 (Ind. Ct. App. 1953)
114 N.E.2d 562

Citing Cases

Schilling v. Ritter

The general rule of law is that the failure to file a transcript of record and assignment of errors within…

Robbins v. Pomeroy Manufacturing Company

transcript and assignment of errors in an appeal from an award of the Industrial Board is filed more than…