From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Welspring Invs. v. Frangi

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Sep 15, 2021
327 So. 3d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1866

09-15-2021

WELSPRING INVESTMENTS, S.A., Appellant, v. Simone FRANGI, Appellee.

Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Edward G. Guedes ; Jorge L. Guerra, P.A., and Jorge L. Guerra, for appellant. Alonso | Appeals, and Cristina Alonso (Pembroke Pines); Brian M. Torres, P.A., and Brian M. Torres, for appellee.


Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., and Edward G. Guedes ; Jorge L. Guerra, P.A., and Jorge L. Guerra, for appellant.

Alonso | Appeals, and Cristina Alonso (Pembroke Pines); Brian M. Torres, P.A., and Brian M. Torres, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ.

LOGUE, J. Welspring Investments, S.A., appeals from a portion of an omnibus order vacating a damages award entered against Simone Frangi following entry of a default. We affirm the trial court's detailed, scholarly, and well-reasoned order concluding that the damages sought by Welspring are unliquidated, thus warranting notice and an opportunity to be heard pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440(c).

"Where a default is entered, the defaulting party admits entitlement to liquidated damages, but not unliquidated damages. Damages are liquidated when the exact amount due may be determined from the pleadings. Where evidence must be presented to determine the amount, however, damages are unliquidated." 1445 Wash. Ltd. P'ship v. Lemontang, 19 So. 3d 1079, 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (citing Cellular Warehouse, Inc. v. GH Cellular, LLC, 957 So. 2d 662, 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ; Bowman v. Kingsland Dev., Inc., 432 So. 2d 660, 662–63 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) ). Where an action involves unliquidated damages, " ‘a party against whom default has been entered is entitled to notice of an order setting the matter for trial, and must be afforded an opportunity to defend.’ " Cellular Warehouse, 957 So. 2d at 666 (quoting Viets v. American Recruiters Enters., Inc., 922 So. 2d 1090, 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ). The damages sought by Welspring for its money lent claim against Frangi are unliquidated because they cannot be "determined with exactness from the cause of action as pleaded, i.e., from a pleaded agreement between the parties, by an arithmetical calculation or by application of definite rules of law." Id. at 665 (quoting Bowman, 432 So. 2d at 662 ).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Welspring Invs. v. Frangi

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Sep 15, 2021
327 So. 3d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Welspring Invs. v. Frangi

Case Details

Full title:Welspring Investments, S.A., Appellant, v. Simone Frangi, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

327 So. 3d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Maiuri v. First Am. Title Ins. Co.

. Welspring Invs., S.A. v. Frangi, 327 So.3d 444, 445 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (emphasis added). There's no issue…