From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jul 9, 1991
811 S.W.2d 73 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 59410.

July 9, 1991.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ARTHUR LITZ, JUDGE.

William J. Swift, St. Louis, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


ORDER


Appellant, George Wells, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. In addition, we find that the motion court did not err in denying appellant's Rule 24.035 motion. Appellant's appeal of the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.


Summaries of

Wells v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jul 9, 1991
811 S.W.2d 73 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Wells v. State

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WELLS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Jul 9, 1991

Citations

811 S.W.2d 73 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)