From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 6, 1995
651 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-780.

March 6, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, John D. Southwood, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Douglas Gurnic, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


In this appeal from an order revoking probation, appellant argues that the case must be remanded so that the trial court may correct its order to reflect the violations which it found had been established by the evidence. The state agrees that a remand is required. Accordingly, we affirm the order revoking appellant's probation, but remand with directions that the trial court enter an amended order specifying the violations found by the trial court to have been established by the evidence. E.g., Cue v. State, 619 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 6, 1995
651 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Wells v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE BERNARD WELLS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 6, 1995

Citations

651 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Crawford v. State

We find no error in the revocation proceeding other than the defect noted by counsel. Therefore, we affirm…