From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. Lizarraga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 21, 2022
2:16-cv-2807 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:16-cv-2807 WBS AC P

04-21-2022

CHRISTOPHER KELLY WELLS, Petitioner, v. JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Respondent.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 33. After receiving an extension of time, petitioner filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 36.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2022 (ECF No. 33), are adopted in full;

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; and

3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Wells v. Lizarraga

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 21, 2022
2:16-cv-2807 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Wells v. Lizarraga

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER KELLY WELLS, Petitioner, v. JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 21, 2022

Citations

2:16-cv-2807 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2022)