From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells v. Keyser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 17, 2021
20 CIVIL 3666 (NSR)(LMS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 3666 (NSR)(LMS)

03-17-2021

NOLAN WELLS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM F. KEYSER, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 15, 2021, MJ Smith's R & R is adopted in its entirety. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is therefore DENIED without prejudice to Petitioner's right to pursue such claims in state court. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005); Lozada v. United States, 107 F.3d 1011, 1017 (2d Cir. 1997), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Perez, 129 F.3d 225, 25960 (2d Cir. 1997). The Court certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 17, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Wells v. Keyser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 17, 2021
20 CIVIL 3666 (NSR)(LMS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Wells v. Keyser

Case Details

Full title:NOLAN WELLS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM F. KEYSER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 17, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 3666 (NSR)(LMS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2021)