From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 15, 2022
1:21-cv-00850-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00850-SAB

09-15-2022

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECF NO. 22)

On September 14, 2022, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 22.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys' fees.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 15, 2022
1:21-cv-00850-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 15, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-00850-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2022)