From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Ford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
No. 3:12-CV-4717-M (BF) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:12-CV-4717-M (BF)

03-18-2013

WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., Plaintiff, v. DARLENE FORD and ALL OCCUPANTS, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion to Remand (doc. 9) is GRANTED. However, Plaintiff's request for costs, expenses and attorney's fees is DENIED. This case shall be REMANDED back to Dallas County Court at Law No. 5 in Dallas, Texas.

________________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Ford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
No. 3:12-CV-4717-M (BF) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., Plaintiff, v. DARLENE FORD and ALL OCCUPANTS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

No. 3:12-CV-4717-M (BF) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Calles

As such, the amount in controversy is not the value of the property, but rather the "value of the right to…