From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WELDER-KAYS v. KUTZ

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division
Aug 29, 2005
No. 4:04-CV-0240 SEB WGH (S.D. Ind. Aug. 29, 2005)

Opinion

No. 4:04-CV-0240 SEB WGH.

August 29, 2005


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE


The Court has granted Defendant Daniel Dougherty's ("Mr. Dougherty") Motion to Dismiss. Although the motion ostensibly only applied to the claims against Mr. Dougherty personally, the legal principles he cites appear to apply in equal degree to claims against Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential"). This issue warrants a response from Plaintiff. Plaintiff is thereby allowed time within which to file a Response Brief on why Defendant Prudential should not be dismissed on the same grounds cited in our order dismissing Mr. Dougherty.

The Court hereby ORDERS Tamara Welder-Kay to SHOW CAUSE, on or before September 9, 2005, why her claims against Prudential should not be dismissed as failing to state a claim under ERISA. FAILURE TO RESPOND TO THIS ORDER IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 9, 2005, WILL RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF THESE CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

WELDER-KAYS v. KUTZ

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division
Aug 29, 2005
No. 4:04-CV-0240 SEB WGH (S.D. Ind. Aug. 29, 2005)
Case details for

WELDER-KAYS v. KUTZ

Case Details

Full title:TAMARA WELDER-KAYS, Plaintiff, v. KLEINERT KUTZ ASSOCIATES HAND CARE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division

Date published: Aug 29, 2005

Citations

No. 4:04-CV-0240 SEB WGH (S.D. Ind. Aug. 29, 2005)