Weiss v. Aurora Bank FSB

Full title: Tom WEISS, Employee/Appellant, v. AURORA BANK FSB, Employer/Respondent…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Sep 18, 2012

380 S.W.3d 612 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97730.

2012-09-18

Tom WEISS, Employee/Appellant, v. AURORA BANK FSB, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Tom Weiss, Dardenne Praire, MO, Acting pro se, for Employee/Appellant. Stuart H. Berkowitz, St. Louis, MO, for Employer/Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
Tom Weiss, Dardenne Praire, MO, Acting pro se, for Employee/Appellant. Stuart H. Berkowitz, St. Louis, MO, for Employer/Respondent.
Robert A. Bedell, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tom Weiss appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission's award. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedentialvalue. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).