From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weisner v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 20, 2023
2:23-cv-00216-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00216-TLN-CKD

06-20-2023

FRANKIE WEISNER, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, is proceeding with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 11, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued May 11, 2023 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. Petitioner's motion for entry of default judgment (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Weisner v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 20, 2023
2:23-cv-00216-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Weisner v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE WEISNER, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 20, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00216-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2023)