From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weisman v. Weisman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 12, 2005
21 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-08773.

September 12, 2005.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated September 8, 2004, which denied his motion, inter alia, for sole custody of the parties' two children and granted the defendant's cross motion for an award of an attorney's fee.

Philip J. Castrovinci, P.C., Smithtown, N.Y. (Ruth Sovronsky of counsel), for appellant.

Jeffrey S. Schecter, Garden City, N.Y. (Bryce R. Levine of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Ritter and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing on the motion and cross motion.

The Supreme Court erred in declining to conduct a hearing on the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, for sole custody of the parties' two children and the defendant's cross motion for an award of an attorney's fee. Because the parties presented conflicting affidavits regarding whether the defendant consumed alcohol in violation of their stipulation of settlement, a hearing was required so that the court could make a determination as to custody that serves the best interests of the children ( see Metzger v. Metzger, 240 AD2d 642; Robert C.R. v. Victoria R., 143 AD2d 262, 263-264; Biagi v. Biagi, 124 AD2d 770; cf. Webster v. Webster, 163 AD2d 178). The defendant's cross motion for an award of an attorney's fee incurred in opposing the plaintiff's motion should also be considered upon remittitur ( see Cole v. Cole, 283 AD2d 602; Matter of Salvati v. Salvati, 242 AD2d 538; see also Rosenzweig v. Gomez, 250 AD2d 664).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Weisman v. Weisman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 12, 2005
21 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Weisman v. Weisman

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY WEISMAN, Appellant, v. ROSEMARIE WEISMAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 12, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 6673
800 N.Y.S.2d 769