From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weiser v. Gumowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 1994
209 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 14, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries he sustained when he fell down a staircase located on premises owned by the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the handrail of the staircase constituted a dangerous or defective condition, as it was loose and pulled away from the wall. The defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that there was no evidence that he had either actual or constructive notice of any such defect or dangerous condition. The Supreme Court denied the motion, and we affirm.

The affidavit of the plaintiff's witness, submitted in opposition to the defendant's motion, was sufficient to preclude the granting of summary judgment, by raising an issue of fact as to whether the defendant had constructive notice of the condition of which the plaintiff complains. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weiser v. Gumowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 14, 1994
209 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Weiser v. Gumowitz

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD J. WEISER, Respondent, v. MILTON GUMOWITZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 614

Citing Cases

Vega v. Hastings Partners

The Supreme Court properly identified numerous issues of fact that preclude an award of judgment as a matter…

Boyd v. Manhattan

At a minimum, the case should be remanded for a new trial because the trial court refused to charge that…