From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weisbrot v. 118-50th Street Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 27, 1999
264 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 16, 1999

September 27, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated July 30, 1998, which granted the motion of the defendant Eastside China, Ltd., inter alia, to vacate its default in appearing in the action.

Harry I. Katz, P.C., Fresh Meadows, N.Y. (Victoria L. Weinman and Samuel M. Lauer of counsel), for appellants.

Bruce A. Lawrence, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Corwin Del Toro of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Based upon all of the relevant factors, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the motion of the defendant Eastside China, Ltd., to vacate its default.

MANGANO, P.J., SANTUCCI, KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weisbrot v. 118-50th Street Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 27, 1999
264 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Weisbrot v. 118-50th Street Associates, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RIVA WEISBROT, et al., appellants, v. 118-50th STREET ASSOCIATES, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 705