Opinion
2003-664 K C.
Decided March 31, 2004.
Appeal by plaintiff from so much of an order of the Civil Court, Kings County (A. Fisher Rubin, J.), entered March 17, 2003, as granted defendant's cross motion for partial summary judgment.
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed without costs and defendant's cross motion for partial summary judgment denied.
PRESENT: ARONIN, J.P., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ.
In this action to recover $25,000 from defendant, a self-storage facility, after the facility failed to return property which plaintiff had stored with it, defendant sought to limit its liability to $5,000, in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement.
Although the lease agreement provided that the tenant would maintain insurance if the total value of the stored property was in excess of $5,000, there was no provision in the agreement that defendant's liability was limited to that amount. In order for a provision limiting liability to a specific amount to be enforceable, the language of that provision must be clear and unambiguous ( see generally Gross v. Sweet, 49 NY2d 102; Levy v. Morgan Bros. Manhattan Stor. Co., 204 AD2d 695). Such was not the case here. Furthermore, the provision which purportedly operated to limit defendant's liability did not comply with the terms of Lien Law § 182 (2) (a) (v), the violation of which may entitle the occupant to treble damages.