From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weintraub v. Kruse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1920
192 App. Div. 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

May, 1920.


Order and judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We think that the memorandum jointly signed was sufficient. (See Tobias v. Lynch, ante, p. 54, decided herewith.) Jenks, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

For amended decision, see post, p. 926.


Summaries of

Weintraub v. Kruse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1920
192 App. Div. 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Weintraub v. Kruse

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN WEINTRAUB, Appellant, v. GUSTAVE E. KRUSE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1920

Citations

192 App. Div. 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Citing Cases

Weintraub v. Kruse

We held that the memorandum jointly signed was sufficient. ( Weintraub v. Kruse, 192 App. Div. 925.) The…