Weinberg v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.

Full title: Brett WEINBERG, Appellant, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Mar 15, 2017

212 So. 3d 1134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D15–1544

03-15-2017

Brett WEINBERG, Appellant, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Bushell Law, P.A., and Daniel A. Bushell (Fort Lauderdale); Scott J. Edwards, P.A., and Scott Edwards (Boca Raton); The Law Offices of Brett A. Weinberg, and Brett A. Weinberg, for appellant. Young, Bill, Boles, Palmer & Duke, P.A., and B. Richard Young, Adam A. Duke, Michel A. Morgan and Derek L. Veliz, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bushell Law, P.A., and Daniel A. Bushell (Fort Lauderdale); Scott J. Edwards, P.A., and Scott Edwards (Boca Raton); The Law Offices of Brett A. Weinberg, and Brett A. Weinberg, for appellant.

Young, Bill, Boles, Palmer & Duke, P.A., and B. Richard Young, Adam A. Duke, Michel A. Morgan and Derek L. Veliz, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment. Because Appellee GEICO concedes Appellant Brett Weinberg's entitlement to (but not the amount of) fees based on GEICO's confession of judgment, and because the trial court's summary judgment retained jurisdiction to address the parties' claims for fees, we do not reach the fee issue raised by Appellant.

Affirmed.