From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weichsel v. Spear

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1882
90 N.Y. 651 (N.Y. 1882)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Weichsel v. Spear (47 N.Y. Super. Ct. 223) substantially the same question was presented as here. There the trial court ordered that the complaint be dismissed, unless the plaintiff amended his complaint within four days, which he was permitted to do on payment of costs. He failed to comply with the terms of the order, and judgment was entered dismissing the complaint, from which he appealed.

Summary of this case from Morris v. Thomas
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued October 17, 1882

Decided October 24, 1882

Lewis Sanders for appellant.

Nathaniel C. Moak for respondent.

Agree to affirm. No opinion.

All concur, except RAPALLO and TRACY, JJ., absent.

Judgment affirmed.

Summaries of

Weichsel v. Spear

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1882
90 N.Y. 651 (N.Y. 1882)

In Weichsel v. Spear (47 N.Y. Super. Ct. 223) substantially the same question was presented as here. There the trial court ordered that the complaint be dismissed, unless the plaintiff amended his complaint within four days, which he was permitted to do on payment of costs. He failed to comply with the terms of the order, and judgment was entered dismissing the complaint, from which he appealed.

Summary of this case from Morris v. Thomas
Case details for

Weichsel v. Spear

Case Details

Full title:GUSTAV A.R. WEICHSEL, Appellant, v . CHARLES SPEAR, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1882

Citations

90 N.Y. 651 (N.Y. 1882)

Citing Cases

Yaple v. New York, Ontario W.R. Co.

" This was like the case at bar, an appeal from a judgment rendered on a failure to comply with the order…

Ralli v. Equit. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

We are not advised by the record as to the grounds upon which the court below became satisfied with the…

5 Citing Cases