From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weems v. Passick

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 1, 2010
09 CV 4512 (ILG) (VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2010)

Opinion

09 CV 4512 (ILG) (VVP).

December 1, 2010


ORDER


A Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky, dated November 3, 2010, recommended that this action should be dismissed with prejudice, as the plaintiff has chosen to abandon his claims. Any objections were to be made within fourteen days, and that failure to do so waives the right to appeal. As of this date, no objection has been filed. The Report and Recommendation, which thoroughly reviewed the facts and the controlling authorities is, after due consideration, hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's counsel, Robert A. Wright, Jr., shall serve a copy of this Order on his client forthwith, by regular mail and by certified mail return receipt requested, and file proof of such service in the record.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

December 1, 2010


Summaries of

Weems v. Passick

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 1, 2010
09 CV 4512 (ILG) (VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Weems v. Passick

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS WEEMS, Plaintiff, v. JON PASSICK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2010

Citations

09 CV 4512 (ILG) (VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2010)