From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weems v. Hodnett

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2015
597 F. App'x 257 (5th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-30412

03-13-2015

TANYA MCLAIN WEEMS, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JAMES DAVID HODNETT; MAYNARD CLARK & TEASLEY, INCORPORATED; JOHN ELBA ARNOLD, IV, doing business as Arnold Group, Incorporated; LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; L. K. HARTSFIELD; RYAN CURTIS; ARNOLD GROUP, INCORPORATED; ARNOLD INSURANCE GROUP, Defendants - Appellees


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 5:10-CV-1452
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Tanya Weems appeals from a final judgment entered by the district court, which granted summary judgment as to all of the defendants. Weems appeals every holding in the district court's orders granting summary judgment. A careful review of the record in this case, a full consideration of the parties' briefs—including Weems' motion for judicial notice—, and a thorough analysis of the district court's rulings, lead us to conclude that the district court's judgments were not in error. Thus, we uphold the district court's grant of summary judgment for each defendant.

The district court judgment is AFFIRMED and pending motions are dismissed as moot. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.


Summaries of

Weems v. Hodnett

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2015
597 F. App'x 257 (5th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Weems v. Hodnett

Case Details

Full title:TANYA MCLAIN WEEMS, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JAMES DAVID HODNETT; MAYNARD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 13, 2015

Citations

597 F. App'x 257 (5th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Sabre Indus., Inc. v. Module X Sols., LLC

While in some instances this is true, this Court has routinely addressed intentional infliction of emotional…