Weed v. Brazill

Full title: LILA MORRISON WEED, an Infant, etc., and MARGARET THOMAS WEED, an Infant…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 14, 1920

192 App. Div. 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

May 14, 1920.

Gustav Lange, Jr., for the appellants.

Edwin Welling Cady of counsel [ Harold Swain, attorney], for the respondents.

SMITH, J.:

It follows from the reasoning in Brazill v. Weed ( 192 App. Div. 66) that this order was properly issued, and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

DOWLING, LAUGHLIN and MERRELL, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.