From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. McKnight

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 3, 2007
225 F. App'x 117 (4th Cir. 2007)

Summary

determining that prisoner's complaints of indigestion, constipation, headaches, occasional vomiting, and emotional distress were not sufficiently serious to rise to the level of an Eighth Amendment violation

Summary of this case from Daniel v. Wilson

Opinion

No. 07-6146.

Submitted: April 26, 2007.

Decided: May 3, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00734-gec-mf).

Michael A. Webb, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michael Allen Webb appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. McKnight, No. 7:06-cv-00734-gec-mf, 2006 WL 3761382 (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Webb v. McKnight

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 3, 2007
225 F. App'x 117 (4th Cir. 2007)

determining that prisoner's complaints of indigestion, constipation, headaches, occasional vomiting, and emotional distress were not sufficiently serious to rise to the level of an Eighth Amendment violation

Summary of this case from Daniel v. Wilson
Case details for

Webb v. McKnight

Case Details

Full title:Michael A. WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. D. McKNIGHT; Mr. Armatrod…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 3, 2007

Citations

225 F. App'x 117 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. United States

Although the PLRA does not define "physical injury" and the Fourth Circuit has not provided a definition,…

Wilson v. United States

Although the PLRA does not define "physical injury" and the Fourth Circuit has not provided a definition,…