From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Clark

Supreme Court of California
Feb 12, 1884
65 Cal. 56 (Cal. 1884)

Opinion

         APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Tehama, and from an order denying a new trial.

         COUNSEL:

         Braynard & Ashurst, for Appellants.

         Jerome Banks, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

         THE COURT.

         Ejectment, wherein plaintiff established in himself a right of entry to the land in dispute at the commencement of the action, and defendant attempted to bar the right by proof of five years' adverse possession from the time of his entry on the land in 1876. But, as a witness on his own behalf, he testified that he had not, at any time during his occupancy of the land, paid the taxes which had been levied and assessed upon it, as required by section 325, of the Code of Civil Procedure, to establish adverse possession. Yet there was a verdict in his favor, which the court below, on motion for a new trial, refused to set aside. This was error. ( C.P.R.R. Co. v. Shackelford, 63 Cal. 261.)

         Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded.


Summaries of

Webb v. Clark

Supreme Court of California
Feb 12, 1884
65 Cal. 56 (Cal. 1884)
Case details for

Webb v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:A. H. WEBB, APPELLANT, v. A. C. CLARK, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 12, 1884

Citations

65 Cal. 56 (Cal. 1884)
2 P. 747

Citing Cases

McDonald v. Drew

This question has been answered negatively by this court in several cases. (Webb v. Clark , 65 Cal. 56; Ross…

Eberhardt v. Coyne

         Since April, 1878, title by adverse possession cannot be established, unless the adverse claimant…