From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Ackerman

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 9, 2015
CV 13-9112-PLA (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2015)

Opinion

          Ray Webb, Plaintiff, Pro se, Long Beach, CA.

          For J. Ackerman, Long Beach City Police Officer, # 10321, sued in his individual capacity, A. Cazarez, Long Beach City Police Officer, # 10311, sued in his individual capacity, T. Diaz, Long Beach City Police Officer, # 10234, sued in his individual capacity, H. Moore, Long Beach City Police Officer, # 10319, sued in his individual capacity, Defendants: Howard Darryl Russell, Long Beach City Attorney's Office, Long Beach, CA.


          PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

          THE HONORABLE PAUL L. ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         At the trial setting conference on February 10, 2105, plaintiff informed the Court that he expected to retain counsel on or before April 1, 2015. The Court instructed plaintiff that if he did not retain counsel by that date, he was required to so notify the Court. As of this date, no counsel on behalf of plaintiff has filed a notice of appearance with the Court, nor has plaintiff notified the Court that he has not retained counsel. Accordingly, no later than April 17, 2015, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to follow Court orders.


Summaries of

Webb v. Ackerman

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 9, 2015
CV 13-9112-PLA (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Webb v. Ackerman

Case Details

Full title:Ray Webb v. Officer J. Ackerman, et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 9, 2015

Citations

CV 13-9112-PLA (C.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2015)