From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weaver v. D'Alessio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 30, 2022
210 A.D.3d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2022–05358

11-30-2022

In the Matter of Everette WEAVER, petitioner, v. Christie L. D'ALESSIO, etc., respondent.

Everette Weaver, Hopewell Junction, NY, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Miranda R. Onnen of counsel), for respondent.


Everette Weaver, Hopewell Junction, NY, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Miranda R. Onnen of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, WILLIAM G. FORD, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & JUDGMENT Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Christie L. D'Alessio, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, to vacate an order dated May 25, 2022, issued in an action entitled Weaver v. Daeira, pending in that court under Index No. 80061/12.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16, 439 N.Y.S.2d 882, 422 N.E.2d 542 ). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

DILLON, J.P., ZAYAS, FORD and DOWLING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weaver v. D'Alessio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 30, 2022
210 A.D.3d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Weaver v. D'Alessio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Everette WEAVER, petitioner, v. Christie L. D'ALESSIO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 30, 2022

Citations

210 A.D.3d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
177 N.Y.S.3d 499