From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weaver v. Connelly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1969 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-1969 KJM CKD P

11-17-2015

WILLIE WEAVER, Plaintiff, v. RON LLOYD CONNELLY, Defendant.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed October 5, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis application or pay the filing within thirty days. He was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order, filed an IFP application, or paid the filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: November 17, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2 / weav1969.fifp


Summaries of

Weaver v. Connelly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-1969 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Weaver v. Connelly

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE WEAVER, Plaintiff, v. RON LLOYD CONNELLY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-1969 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2015)