From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wazney v. SouthCarolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2019
No. 19-6084 (4th Cir. May. 29, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-6084

05-29-2019

ROBERT WILLIAM WAZNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee.

Robert William Wazney, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-02610-HMH) Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert William Wazney, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert William Wazney appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wazney v. South Carolina, No. 6:18-cv-02610-HMH (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Wazney v. SouthCarolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2019
No. 19-6084 (4th Cir. May. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Wazney v. SouthCarolina

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WILLIAM WAZNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 29, 2019

Citations

No. 19-6084 (4th Cir. May. 29, 2019)

Citing Cases

Talley v. Pa. Dep't of Corrs.

Since such actions were pursuant to both judicial and statutory directives, the unknown clerk is entitled to…

Steiner v. Idaho

the federal district court must determine whether the content of the request is better construed as a civil…