From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 19, 2014
446 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. WD 75961.

08-19-2014

Preston K. WATTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Gregory A. Doty, for Appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, for Respondent.


Gregory A. Doty, for Appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, for Respondent.

Before Special Division: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Preston K. Watts, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing by the Circuit Court of Bates County. Watts argues on appeal that (1) trial counsel was ineffective in eliciting hearsay, specifically, an out-of-court statement made by Brian Watts; (2) the trial court erred in considering his ability to pay the costs of his pretrial incarceration in determining whether to order him into a long-term treatment program; and (3) trial counsel and direct appeal counsel were ineffective for failing to address or raise as plain error the trial court's alleged error in determining whether to order long-term treatment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Watts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 19, 2014
446 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Watts v. State

Case Details

Full title:Preston K. WATTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 19, 2014

Citations

446 S.W.3d 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)