From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jun 4, 2002
77 S.W.3d 52 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. ED 80217

June 4, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marion County, Honorable Robert M. Clayton II.

Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.



ORDER


Movant, Kimmie Watts, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We previously affirmed Movant's conviction on two counts of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.211, RSMo 2000. State v. Watts, 30 S.W.3d 249 (Mo.App.E.D. 2000). He now contends his counsel provided ineffective assistance during plea negotiations.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Watts v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jun 4, 2002
77 S.W.3d 52 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Watts v. State

Case Details

Full title:KIMMIE WATTS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Jun 4, 2002

Citations

77 S.W.3d 52 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)