From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Flory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-2688 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-2688 GEB CKD P

03-26-2013

TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. S. FLORY, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 28, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 28, 2013, are adopted in full and

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice as to defendants Flory, Mini, Rios, Johnson, Masuret, Baker, Guches, and Lieber; and

3. The Clerk of Court shall amend the docket to reflect that this action proceeds against defendants Virga and Macomber only.

________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Watts v. Flory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-2688 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Watts v. Flory

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WATTS, Plaintiff, v. S. FLORY, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-2688 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)