From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watters v. Sarcione

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
May 17, 2013
No. 30 MM 2013 (Pa. May. 17, 2013)

Opinion

No. 30 MM 2013

05-17-2013

BARRY D. WATTERS, Petitioner v. JUDGE ANTHONY SARCIONE, CHESTER COUNTY COMMON PLEAS JUDGE, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2013, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Watters v. Sarcione

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
May 17, 2013
No. 30 MM 2013 (Pa. May. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Watters v. Sarcione

Case Details

Full title:BARRY D. WATTERS, Petitioner v. JUDGE ANTHONY SARCIONE, CHESTER COUNTY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: May 17, 2013

Citations

No. 30 MM 2013 (Pa. May. 17, 2013)