From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Wagstaffe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 16, 2024
23-cv-06140-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-06140-JD

01-16-2024

ADRIAN DEWITT MARCEL WATSON, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN M. WAGSTAFFE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL RE: DKT. NO. 3

JAMES DONATO United States District Judge.

A civil rights complaint was filed on behalf of plaintiff, a detainee. Plaintiff did not sign the complaint. Plaintiff was sent two notices that he must submit a signed complaint to continue with this action. Plaintiff has not submitted a signed complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) this case is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk is requested to close the case. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3) is vacated and no fee is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Watson v. Wagstaffe

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 16, 2024
23-cv-06140-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Watson v. Wagstaffe

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN DEWITT MARCEL WATSON, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN M. WAGSTAFFE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 16, 2024

Citations

23-cv-06140-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2024)