Watson v. State

Full title: Bruce WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: May 21, 2019

580 S.W.3d 37 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 106558

05-21-2019

Bruce WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Alexandria A. Shah, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Alexandria A. Shah, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bruce Watson ("Movant") appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).