From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Klamath County

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 23, 1992
827 P.2d 207 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

8902595-CV; CA A69146

Argued and submitted February 26, 1992

On appeal, reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment on jury verdict; affirmed on cross-appeal April 1, 1992 Reconsideration denied May 20, petition for review denied June 23, 1992 ( 313 Or. 355)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Klamath County.

Rodger J. Isaacson, Judge.

Michael L. Spencer, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant — cross-respondent.

Robert Chapman, Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent — cross-appellant.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

On appeal, reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment on jury verdict; affirmed on cross-appeal.


In this personal injury negligence action, the trial court denied plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Klamath County. The trial court then granted plaintiff's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict against the county. County appeals.

There was evidence from which the jury could have determined that negligence of the driver of the vehicle in which plaintiff was riding was the sole cause of the accident and plaintiff's injuries. The issue was properly submitted to the jury. The trial court erred in granting the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

We affirm on plaintiff's cross-appeal.

On appeal, reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment on the jury verdict; affirmed on cross-appeal.


Summaries of

Watson v. Klamath County

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 23, 1992
827 P.2d 207 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Watson v. Klamath County

Case Details

Full title:Paul K. WATSON, Respondent — Cross — Appellant, v. KLAMATH COUNTY…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 23, 1992

Citations

827 P.2d 207 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
827 P.2d 207