From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watley v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 17, 2013
Civil Action 2:01-cv-00416 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:01-cv-00416

01-17-2013

Rayshan Watley, Jr., Plaintiff v. Cheryl Martinez and James Goodman, Defendants


Judge Marbley


Magistrate Judge Abel


ORDER

Plaintiff's November 26, 2012 motion to vacate order requiring payment of court costs, fines and/or restitution (doc. 27) is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 (b)(1) "[I]f a prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee."

Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), Rule 72(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., and Eastern Division Order No. 91-3, pt. F, 5, either party may, within fourteen (14) days after this Order is filed, file and serve on the opposing party a motion for reconsideration by the District Judge. The motion must specifically designate the Order, or part thereof, in question and the basis for any objection thereto. The District Judge, upon consideration of the motion, shall set aside any part of this Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Mark R. Abel

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Watley v. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 17, 2013
Civil Action 2:01-cv-00416 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Watley v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:Rayshan Watley, Jr., Plaintiff v. Cheryl Martinez and James Goodman…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

Civil Action 2:01-cv-00416 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 17, 2013)