From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watkins v. Trans Union, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
Feb 15, 2019
Cause No. 2:14-cv-135-WTL-MJD (S.D. Ind. Feb. 15, 2019)

Summary

finding the defendant's argument that certain documents did not exist was "entirely without merit" because one of the defendant's witnesses contradicted this point during a deposition

Summary of this case from Zimmer, Inc. v. Beamalloy Reconstructive Med. Prods., LLC

Opinion

Cause No. 2:14-cv-135-WTL-MJD

02-15-2019

RICHARD WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 255) on the Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Dkt. No. 204). The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to the applicable statute rule to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as set forth in Docket Number 255 in its entirety. The Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff the amount of $10,532.75 and file a notice that the payment has been made within 21 days of the date of this Order.

SO ORDERED: 2/15/2019

/s/_________

Hon. William T. Lawrence, Senior Judge

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana Copies to all counsel of record via electronic notification


Summaries of

Watkins v. Trans Union, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
Feb 15, 2019
Cause No. 2:14-cv-135-WTL-MJD (S.D. Ind. Feb. 15, 2019)

finding the defendant's argument that certain documents did not exist was "entirely without merit" because one of the defendant's witnesses contradicted this point during a deposition

Summary of this case from Zimmer, Inc. v. Beamalloy Reconstructive Med. Prods., LLC
Case details for

Watkins v. Trans Union, LLC

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 15, 2019

Citations

Cause No. 2:14-cv-135-WTL-MJD (S.D. Ind. Feb. 15, 2019)

Citing Cases

Zimmer, Inc. v. Beamalloy Reconstructive Med. Prods., LLC

Thus, Beamalloy's proportionality argument was "entirely without merit," for purposes of Rule…

Pursell v. HydroChem, LLC

The Court notes that counsel should only be reimbursed for fees for time spent as a result of the motion to…