Waterman v. Taub

Full title: LOUIS WATERMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. MAX TAUB ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

131 A. 924 (N.J. 1926)

131 A. 924

Opinion

Submitted October 29, 1925 —

Decided February 1, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 216.

For the respondents, Morris Umansky.

For the appellants, Tiffany, Brugler Wittreich.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.