From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. U.S. Dept. of Defense

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 7, 2009
328 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-1880.

Submitted: June 22, 2009.

Decided: July 7, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00482-RLW).

Scott G. Crowley, Sr., Crowley Crowley, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Debra J. Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel L. Freye, Office of Counsel, Defense Supply Center Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Carolyn L. Washington appeals the district court's order dismissing this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. United States Dep't of Defense, No. 3:07-cv-00482-RLW, 2008 WL 2725810 (E.D.Va. July 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Washington v. U.S. Dept. of Defense

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 7, 2009
328 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Washington v. U.S. Dept. of Defense

Case Details

Full title:Carolyn L. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 7, 2009

Citations

328 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Dep't of Def.

Carolyn L. WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY.Case below, 328…

John Doe v. Brennan

The question facing this Court is whether Plaintiff's non-conclusory factual allegations support reasonable…