From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 21, 2000
14 S.W.3d 667 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76825

March 21, 2000

APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; HON. JOHN RILEY, JUDGE.

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1221 Locust St., Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant. Jeremiah W. Nixon, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before TEITELMAN, P.J., AHRENS, J., MOONEY, J.


ORDER


Eric Washington ("Movant") appeals the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts the absolute filing deadline imposed by Rule 29.15 is unconstitutional because it makes no provision for late filing for good cause shown.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Washington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 21, 2000
14 S.W.3d 667 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERIC WASHINGTON, APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Mar 21, 2000

Citations

14 S.W.3d 667 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)