From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION II
Mar 17, 1998
963 S.W.2d 482 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72636

OPINION FILED: March 17, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Louis City; Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge.

Dave Hemingway, Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.



ORDER


Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Washington v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION II
Mar 17, 1998
963 S.W.2d 482 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT WASHINGTON, APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION II

Date published: Mar 17, 1998

Citations

963 S.W.2d 482 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)